Skip to main content
Log in

Distribution of unionid freshwater mussels and host fishes in Texas. A study of broad-scale spatial patterns across basins and a strong climate gradient

  • FRESHWATER BIVALVES
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unionid freshwater mussels are a threatened fauna, and understanding their distribution is essential to aid and promote conservation efforts. Therefore, we (1) compared patterns of species richness and endemism of Texas mussel and fish species, as mussels depend on fish for their reproduction and dispersal; (2) examined how distribution and community composition of mussels and fishes varies across river basins; and (3) how much variation in mussel community composition could be explained by the distribution of potential host fish, river basin (as a spatial component), ecoregion (as proxy for large-scale environmental differences), and flow variability. Mussel and fish community compositions in rivers differed significantly between river basins with an east-to-west gradient of decreasing species richness following the transition from sub-humid to arid climate. River basin explained 25% of the variation in mussel community composition, and potential host fish presence explained 20%. The total variation explained by both variables was 34%, as part of the variation in host fish presence (11.5%) was spatially structured by differences in river basins. Flow variability explained an additional 14% of the variation in mussel community composition, and ecoregion an additional 9% compared with river basin alone. Locations of significantly higher mussel species richness and/or endemism were present in rivers from all regions of Texas. These locations should be protected, especially as human population continues to expand and urbanize in these regions. A better understanding of mussel–host fish relationships and the impact of flow variation on the distribution of mussels will be needed to inform conservation efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Rabab’ah, M. A. & C. G. Williams, 2004. An ancient bottleneck in the Lost Pines of central Texas. Molecular Ecology 13: 1075–1084.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, C. L. & C. C. Vaughn, 2014. Biogeochemical hotspots: temporal and spatial scaling of the impacts of freshwater mussels on ecosystem function. Freshwater Biology 60: 563–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, C. L., J. P. Jullian & C. C. Vaughn, 2012. Scale-dependent longitudinal patterns in mussel communities. Freshwater Biology 57: 2272–2284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, T. and D.T. Runyan, 2007. Fish assemblage changes in three western Gulf slope drainages. Texas Water Development Board Contract No. 2005483033. www.twdb.state.tx.us/RWPG/rpgm_rpts/2005483033_fish.pdf.

  • Bowles, D. E. & T. L. Arsuffi, 1993. Karst aquatic ecosystems of the Edwards Plateau region of central Texas, USA: a consideration of their importance, threats to their existence, and efforts for their conservation. Awuatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 3: 317–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. M., G. George & W. Daniel, 2010. Urbanization and a threatened freshwater mussel: evidence from landscape scale studies. Hydrobiologia 655: 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burlakova, L. E. & A. Y. Karatayev, 2007. The effect of invasive macrophytes and water level fluctuations on unionids in Texas impoundments. Hydrobiologia 586: 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burlakova, L. E., A. Y. Karatayev, V. A. Karatayev, M. E. May, D. L. Bennett & M. J. Cook, 2011a. Biogeography and conservation of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in Texas: patterns of diversity and threats. Diversity and Distributions 17: 393–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burlakova, L. E., A. Y. Karatayev, V. A. Karatayev, M. E. May, D. L. Bennett & M. J. Cook, 2011b. Endemic species: Contribution to community uniqueness, effect of habitat alteration, and conservation priorities. Biological Conservation 144: 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Y., A. Stodola, S. Douglass, D. Shasteen, K. Cummings & A. Holtrop, 2015. Modelling and mapping the distribution, diversity, and abundance of freshwater mussels (Family Unionididae) in wadeable streams of Illinois, USA. Freshwater Biology 60: 1379–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CGIAR-CSI Global Aridity and Global-PET Database (CGIAR-CSI), 2008. Global-PET Annual. http://www.cgiar-csi.org/. Accessed 6 Apr 2014).

  • Conner, J. V. & R. D. Suttkus, 1986. Zoogeography of freshwater fishes of the Western Gulf Slope of North America. In Hocutt, C. H. & E. O. Wiley (eds), The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes. John Wiley and Sons, New York: 413–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, W. M. & K. M. Brown, 2013. Multifactorial model of habitat, host fish, and landscape effects on Louisiana freshwater mussels. Freshwater Science 32: 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. B. & R. G. Shaw, 2001. Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. Science 292: 673–679.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elderkin, C. L., A. D. Christian, C. C. Vaughn, J. L. Metcalfe-Smith & D. J. Berg, 2007. Population genetics of the freshwater mussel, Amblema plicata (Say 1817) (Bivalvia: Unionidae): evidence of high dispersal and post-glacial colonization. Conservation Genetics 8: 355–372.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elderkin, C. L., A. D. Christian, J. L. Metcalfe-Smith & D. J. Berg, 2008. Population genetics and phylogeography of freshwater mussels in North America, Elliptio diltata and Actinonaias ligamentina (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Molecular Ecology 17: 2149–2163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI, 2014. How Hot Spot Analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*) works. ArcGIS Pro, ESRI. http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/spatial-statistics/h-how-hot-spot-analysis-getis-ord-gi-spatial-stati.htm. Accessed 10 May 2016

  • ESRI, 2015. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.3.1. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands (C.A.).

  • ESRI, 2016. Optimized Hot Spot Analysis. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., ERSI. http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.3/tools/spatial-statistics-toolbox/optimized-hot-spot-analysis.htm. Accessed 12 Dec 2016

  • French, M., 2005. Flood risk outreach and the public’s need to know. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education 130: 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. F. & A. M. Oliver, 2015. The known potential hosts of texas mussels: implications for future research and conservation efforts. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 18: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, N. B., J. Gullet & M. E. May, 2009. Diversity and abundance of unionid mussels in three sanctuaries on the Sabine River in northeast Texas. Texas Journal of Science 61: 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, N. B., K. Heffentrager, D. F. Ford, A. D. Walters & N. Marshall, 2014. Significant recent records of unionid mussels in Northeast Texas rivers. Walkerana 17: 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. F., A. D. Walters, L. R. Williams, M. G. Williams & N. B. Ford, 2016. Mussel assemblages in streams of different sizes in the neches river basin of texas. Southeastern Naturalist 15(1): 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graf, D. L., 2002. Historical biogeography and late glacial origin of the freshwater pearly mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) faunas of Lake Erie, North America. Occasional Papers on Mollusks, The Department of Mollusks, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge (M.A.) 6: 175–211.

  • Galbraith, H. S., D. E. Spooner & C. C. Vaughn, 2010. Synergistic effects of regional climate patterns and local water management on freshwater mussel communities. Biological Conservation 143: 1175–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, K. K., C. C. Vaugh & J. P. Julian, 2015. Developing environmental flow recommendations for freshwater mussels using the biological traits of species guilds. Freshwater Biology 60(4): 620–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, P. L., 2012. Cumulative impacts of urban runoff and municipal wastewater effluents on wild freshwater mussels (Lasmigona costata). Science of the Total Environment 431: 348–356.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, P. L., S. K. Higgins & M. B. Jorge, 2014. Evidence of oxidative stress in wild freshwater mussels (Lasmigona costata) exposed to urban-derived contaminants. Ecotoxicology And Environmental Safety 102: 62–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haag, W. R., 2012. North American Freshwater Mussels – Natural History, Ecology, and Conservation. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haag, W. R. & M. L. Warren, 1998. Role of ecological factors and reproductive strategies in structuring freshwater communities. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haag, W. R., and M. L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Effects of severe drought on freshwater mussel assemblages. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 137(4): 1165–1178.

  • Hewitt, G., 2000. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405: 907–913.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heard, T. C., J. S. Pekrin & T. H. Bonner, 2012. Intr-annual variation in fish communities and habitat associations in a Chihuahua Desert Reach of the Rio Grande/Rio Bravo Del Norte. Western North American Naturalist 72: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howells, R. G., C. M. Mather & J. A. M. Bergmenn, 2000. Impacts of dewatering and cold on freshwater mussels (Unionidae) in B.A. Steinhagen Reservoir, Texas. Texas Journal of Science 52: 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbs, C., 1957. Distributional patterns of Texas fresh-water fishes. The Southwestern Naturalist 2: 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. W., Neves, R. J., Hallerman, E. M., 2015. Historical demography of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae): genetic evidence for population expansion and contraction during the late Pleistocene and Holocene. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 114: 376–397.

  • Kappes, H. & P. Haase, 2012. Slow, but steady: dispersal of freshwater mollusks. Aquatic Sciences 74: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karatayev, A. Y., T. D. Miller & L. E. Burlakova, 2012. Long-term changes in unionid assemblages in the Rio Grande, one of the World’s top 10 rivers at risk. Aquatic Conservation: Marine Freshwater Ecosystems 22: 206–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karatayev, A.Y., L.E. Burlakova, T.D.Miller & M.F. Perrelli, 2015. Reconstructing historical range and population size of an endangered mollusc: long-term decline of Popenaias popeii in the Rio Grande, Texas. Hydrobiologia 1–17.

  • Krebs, R. A., W. C. Borden, E. R. Steiner, M. S. Lyons, W. Zawiski & B. M. Walton, 2010. Determinants of mussel diversity in Lake Erie tributaries. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29: 506–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P. & L. Legendre, 1998. Numerical Ecology, 2nd ed. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, R. J., 2012. Patterns of endemism and species richness of fishes of the Western Gulf Slope. Thesis.

  • Melillo, J. M., T. C. Richmond, G. W. Yohe, eds, 2014. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, 841 pp. doi:10.7930/J0Z31WJ2.

  • National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (WSR), n.d. National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. http://www.rivers.gov/index.php. Accessed 8 Jan 2016

  • Neck, R. W., 1982. Preliminary Analysis of the regional zoogeography of the freshwater mussels of Texas. Proceedings of the Symposium on Recent Adjacent States.

  • Newton, T. J., D. A. Woolnough & D. L. Strayer, 2008. Using landscape ecology to understand and manage freshwater mussel populations. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27: 424–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkin, J. S., Z. R. Shattuck, J. E. Gerken & T. H. Bonner, 2013. Fragmentation and drought legacy correlated with distribution of Burrhead Chub in subtropical streams of North America. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 142: 1287–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PRISM Climate Group, Oregon State University (PRISM), 2013. http://prism.oregonstate.edu. Accessed 5 Apr 2014.

  • R Development Core Team (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.

  • Randklev, C. R., B. J. Lundeen, R. G. Howells & J. H. Kennedy, 2010. Habitat preference and first account of a living population of Texas Fawnsfoot, Truncilla macrodon (Bivalvia: Unionidae) In the Brazos River. The Southwestern Naturalist 55: 297–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randklev, C. R., E. T. Tsakiris, M. S. Johnson, J. Skorupski, L. E. Burlakova, J. Groce & N. Wilkins, 2013a. Is False Spike, Quadrula mitchelli (Bivalvia: Unionidae), extinct? First account of a very-recently deceased individual in over thirty years. The Southwestern Naturalist 58: 268–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randklev, C. R., M. S. Johnson, E. T. Tsakiris, J. Groce & N. Wilkins, 2013b. Status of the freshwater mussel (Unionidae) communities of the mainstem of the Leon River, Texas. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 23: 390–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randklev, C. R., N. Ford, S. Wolverton, J.H. Kennedy, J. H., Robertson, C., Mayes, K., & D. Ford, D. 2015a. The influence of stream discontinuity and life history strategy on mussel community structure: a case study from the Sabine River, Texas. Hydrobiologia, 1–19.

  • Randklev, C. R., N. Ford, S. Wolverton, J. H. Kennedy, C. Robertson, K. Mayes & D. Ford, 2015b. The influence of stream discontinuity and life history strategy on mussel community structure: a case study from the Sabine River, Texas. Hydrobiologia 2015: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashleigh, B., 2008. Nestedness in riverine mussel communities: patterns across sites and fish hosts. Ecography 31: 612–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawicz, K., T. Wagener, M. Sivapalan, P.A. Troch, G. Carrillo, 2011. Catchment classification: empirical analysis of hydrologic similarity based on catchment function in the eastern USA. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15: 2895–2911.

  • Schwalb, A. N., T. J. Morris, N. E. Mandrak & K. Cottenie, 2012. Distribution of unionid freshwater mussels depends on the distribution of host fishes on a regional scale. Diversity and Distributions 19: 446–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwalb, A. N., T. J. Morris & K. Cottenie, 2015. Dispersal abilities of riverine freshwater mussels influence metacommunity structure. Freshwater Biology 60: 911–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singley, J.A., 1893. Contributions to the natural history of Texas. Part 1. Texas Mollusca. Geological Survey of Texas, 4th annual report. pp. 299–343

  • Spooner, D. E. & C. C. Vaughn, 2008. A trait-based approach to species’ roles in stream ecosystems: climate change, community structure, and material cycling. Community Ecology 159: 307–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, D. L., 2008. Freshwater Mussel Ecology: A Multifactor Approach to Distribution and Abundance. University of California Press, Berkley (NY).

  • Strecker, J., 1931. The distribution of naiades or pearly fresh-water mussels of Texas. Baylor University Museum Bulletin.

  • Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). 2014. Dams.gdb.

  • Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD), 2016. Federally and State Listed Species in Texas. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin (T.X.). https://tpwd.texas.gov/huntwild/wild/wildlife_diversity/nongame/listed-species/. Accessed 19 Oct 2016

  • Thorp, J. H. & A. P. Covich, 2010. Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates, 3rd ed. Academic Press, Elsevier, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troia, M. J., L. R. Williams, M. G. Williams & N. B. Ford, 2015. The process domains concept as a framework for fish and mussel habitat in a coastal plain river of southeastern North America. Ecological Engineering 75: 484–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, C. C., 1997. Regional patterns of mussel species distributions in North American rivers. Ecography 20: 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, C. C. & C. M. Taylor, 2000. Macroecology of a host-parasite relationship. Ecography 23: 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, C. C., C. L. Atkinson & J. P. Julian, 2015. Drought-induced changes in flow regimes lead to long-term losses in mussel-provided ecosystem services. Ecology and Evolution 5: 1291–1305.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Watters, G. T., 1992. Unionids, fish and the species-area curve. Journal of Biogeography 19: 481–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolaver, B. D., C. E. Cook, D. L. Sunding, S. F. Hamilton, B. R. Scanlon, M. H. Young, X. Xu & R. C. Reedy, 2013. Potential economic impacts of environmental flows following a possible listing of endangered Texas freshwater mussels. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 50: 1081–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanatta, D. T. & A. T. Harris, 2013. Phylogeography and Genetic Variability of the Freshwater Mussels (Bivalvia Unionidae) Ellipse, Venustaconcha ellipsiformis (Conrad 1836), and Bleeding Tooth, V. Pleasii (Marsh 1891). American Malacological Bulletin 31: 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanatta, D. T. & R. W. Murphy, 2008. The phylogeographical and management implications of genetic population structure in the imperiled snuffbox mussel, Epioblasma triquetra (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 93: 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Jenae Olson for her help in organizing the data during the initial stages of research, and Tim Bonner for contributing fish data and sharing his knowledge of fishes in Texas. Unionid data collection was funded in part by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service State Wildlife Grant Program through the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (2004–2011); the Texas Water Development Board (2006–2007); U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, and the New Mexico Department of Game and Fish (Joint Traditional Section 6 Program, 2011–2014). L.E. Burlakova was also supported by the Research Foundation of SUNY, and A.N. Schwalb was supported by the Research Enhancement Program at Texas State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. N. Schwalb.

Additional information

Guest editors: Manuel P. M. Lopes-Lima, Ronaldo G. Sousa, Lyuba E. Burlakova, Alexander Y. Karatayev & Knut Mehler / Ecology and Conservation of Freshwater Bivalves

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 408 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dascher, E.D., Burlakova, L.E., Karatayev, A.Y. et al. Distribution of unionid freshwater mussels and host fishes in Texas. A study of broad-scale spatial patterns across basins and a strong climate gradient. Hydrobiologia 810, 315–331 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3168-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3168-5

Keywords