--- /dev/null
+{% extends "base.html" %}
+{% block title %}PGCA Frequently Asked Questions{% endblock %}
+{% block maincontent %}
+
+ <h1>Frequently Asked Questions</h1>
+ <p>
+ This page attempts to answer some of the questions we are commonly asked about the Postgres Community Association.
+ If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to <a href="mailto:board@postgres.ca">email us</a>.
+ </p>
+
+ <h2>General</h2>
+
+ <h3>What do you do?</h3>
+ <p>At the request of the <a href="https://www.postgresql.org/developer/core/">Core Team</a>, the primary task of
+ PGCA is to manage and maintain assets (domain names and trademarks) for the PostgreSQL Project.</p>
+
+ <h3>How are you funded?</h3>
+ <p>Our funding comes entirely from donations.</p>
+
+ <h3>Why doesn't the project manage its assets directly?</h3>
+ <p>Neither the PostgreSQL Global Development Group or the PostgreSQL Core Team are legal entities, and thus they
+ cannot own assets, except as individuals.</p>
+
+ <h2>Trademarks</h2>
+
+ <h3>I want to use one of your trademarks. How do I do so?</h3>
+ <p>Many uses of our marks fall under "fair use" which does not require any permission. The
+ <a href="https://www.postgresql.org/about/policies/trademarks/">Trademark Policy</a> describes these uses and
+ general requirements. We worked very hard with our legal counsel to make the policy as flexible and permissive
+ as possible. For uses that fall outside of the policy, a general use or tradename licence may be granted by
+ PGCA on application.</p>
+
+ <h3>What are the criteria for receiving a general use or tradename licence?</h3>
+ <p>The PGCA board evaluates several criteria for issuing a licence that falls outside of fair use, such as
+ modifications to the marks, the use of the marks within their context, would the marks create confusion with the
+ community marks, and if the usage of marks could risk bringing the project into disrepute, to name a few.</p>
+
+ <h3>How much do you charge for trademark licences?</h3>
+ <p>There is no charge for a trademark licence. In rare cases where a non-standard agreement may be required which
+ involves significant work from counsel, we may ask for a contribution towards the cost.</p>
+
+ <h3>Why do some other organisations have related trademarks?</h3>
+ <p>These generally fall into one of a number of categories:</p>
+ <ul>
+ <li>They are unauthorised, and may be (if appropriate) or are being disputed.</li>
+ <li>The organisation has a licence agreement with us.</li>
+ <li>They are an NPO who follow the community NPO guidelines, such as PostgreSQL Europe, who are working with PGCA
+ to adopt pre-existing marks into the community framework.</li>
+ </ul>
+
+ <h3>Do you have a list of the licence agreements you've entered into?</h3>
+ <p>There is no public list as the agreements are confidential, including the names of the parties involved.</p>
+
+ <h2>Governance</h2>
+
+ <h3>Why aren't there open and public elections to the PGCA board?</h3>
+ <p>It's essential to make sure that it's not possible for a rogue actor to attempt to take over PGCA and gain
+ control of the trademarks and domains owned by the project. This is a very difficult problem to solve as any
+ well-funded entity could potentially have large numbers of their staff join as members and then vote to change
+ the board and bylaws however they see fit, if we were to open up membership to the public.</p>
+
+ <h3>Can I apply to join the PGCA board?</h3>
+ <p>We always consider applications; this is done at the AGM which typically happens in late May or early June. Our
+ articles of incorporation restrict the board to a maximum of 7 and our bylaws require that at least two of those
+ directors be members of the PostgreSQL Core Team, but we would also only be likely to accept people with long
+ term good standing in the PostgreSQL Community, with a history of meaningful contributions. We would also need
+ to ensure that no single organisation employs the majority of board members.</p>
+
+ <h3>Why do you not have term limits for board members?</h3>
+ <p>Managing trademarks in particular can be extremely time consuming, stressful, and requires an understanding of
+ trademark law, particularly in how it applies to open source software, and processes to minimise the need to
+ consult counsel (which can be very expensive). The current members of the board have spent years learning from
+ professionals, and forcing them to step down after a fixed period could be extremely damaging to the organisation
+ if suitably experienced replacements could not be found.</p>
+{% endblock %}