Francesco Mucio’s Post

Following up on my last post about the Open Transformation Specification (OTS), I'm humbled by the interest and questions I've received! A few of you even asked about a community. I'm continuing to refine and detail the OTS standard. To ensure its robustness, I'd greatly value the input of wiser heads. Is there a community to discuss ideas about OTS? Not yet, but we can build it. For now I have created a Discord server (as usual, link in the comments) https://lnkd.in/d2i2CtDr

Just wrote this on r/dataengineering Introducing Open Transformation Specification (OTS) – a portable, executable standard for data transformations https://lnkd.in/dCdse2Gt Hi everyone, I’ve spent the last few weeks talking with a friend about the lack of a standard for data transformations. Our conversation started with the Fivetran + dbt merger (and the earlier acquisition of SQLMesh): what alternative tool is out there? And what would make me confident in such tool? Since dbt became popular, we can roughly define a transformation as: - a SELECT statement - a schema definition (optional, but nice to have) - some logic for materialization (table, view, incremental) - data quality tests - and other elements (semantics, unit tests, etc.) If we had a standard we could move a transformation from one tool to another, but also have mutliple tools work together (interoperability). Honestly, I initially wanted to start building a tool, but I forced myself to sit down and first write a standard for data transformations. Quickly, I realized the specification also needed to include tests and UDFs (this is my pet peeve with transformation tools, UDF are part of my transformations). It’s just an initial draft, and I’m sure it’s missing a lot. But it’s open, and I’d love to get your feedback to make it better. I am also bulding my open source tool, but that is another story.

I generated this with NotebookLM and I was like "why they didn't invite me to their podcast?" https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TRpx-Im_rjGKIc4ZJ7B0XUK_rkAWV2-5/view?usp=sharing

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories