Best Practices in Phage Display: Optimizing Binding Affinity

Phage display is widely used in drug discovery, diagnostics, and protein engineering. At its core, it enables the selection of high-affinity ligands for specific targets through iterative rounds of biopanning. However, achieving ligands with the highest possible binding affinity requires careful attention to detail and adherence to best practices throughout the process. Below, we’ll explore key strategies for optimizing binding affinity during phage display biopanning.

1. Start with a High-Quality Library

The foundation of successful phage display lies in the quality and design of your library. A phage display library acts as the starting point for identifying ligands with high specificity and affinity for a given target, making it a critical component of the entire process. Whether you're working with a naïve library, which contains a broad and unbiased repertoire of variants; a synthetic library, designed to include tailored sequences for improved diversity and functionality; or a library derived from immunized hosts, the diversity and composition of the library are key factors.

High diversity ensures that the library has a wide range of potential candidates, increasing the chances of identifying ligands with superior binding properties, stability, and specificity. Furthermore, tailoring the library's design and functionality to align precisely with the unique characteristics, constraints, and requirements of the phage display project can substantially enhance the overall efficiency and accuracy of the selection process. This process can involve incorporating convenient features such as specific tags, an amber stop codon to support ligand expression, and efficient elution mechanisms. Additionally, the quality of your library is crucial. For instance, the presence of unintended sequences, such as stop codons or other mutations, should be kept to an absolute minimum. To ensure this, libraries must undergo rigorous quality control. At the very least, next-generation sequencing (NGS) data should be provided to demonstrate the library's diversity and the percentage of accurate sequences.

A robust, well-constructed library not only enhances the likelihood of successfully isolating the ideal molecules but also saves valuable time and resources during the screening and optimization phases.

2. Be Strategic with Your Target Preparation

The presentation of your target is critical for selecting high-affinity binders, as it directly influences the success of binding interactions. Whether your target is a protein, peptide, carbohydrate, or another type of biomolecule, ensuring it is properly folded and biologically active is essential. For example, a protein target must maintain its native conformation to ensure that binding epitopes are accessible and accurately mimic their physiological state. Misfolded proteins or improperly presented targets can lead to low-affinity or non-specific binding, ultimately resulting in unreliable outcomes.

When immobilizing your target, the method you use should minimize alterations that could impact the binding epitopes. For instance, proteins attached to magnetic beads via their amino groups may inadvertently block key binding domains if the immobilization site overlaps with an epitope. In contrast, site-specific biotinylation followed by immobilization on streptavidin-coated surfaces can help ensure that the target remains oriented correctly and retains its active conformation.

Similarly, for carbohydrate targets, immobilization methods that involve covalent attachment to microtiter plates via random chemical groups can disrupt their structural integrity or spatial arrangement, affecting binding interactions. Using spacer arms or linkers can help preserve the natural presentation of the carbohydrate structure, providing a more accurate representation for binder selection.

Ultimately, careful consideration of both the target's biological activity and the immobilization technique is key to maintaining the integrity of binding epitopes and ensuring reliable binder selection.

3. Fine-Tune Selection Pressure

Affinity selections (biopanning) rely on carefully adjusting stringency throughout the selection process to ensure the identification of high-affinity binders. In the early rounds, the goal is to capture a diverse pool of potential binders. This is typically achieved by using lower stringency conditions, such as shorter washing times, lower detergent concentrations, or higher target concentrations. For example, in the first round, a higher concentration of the target protein may be immobilized on the surface, allowing even weakly binding candidates to be retained.

As the selection progresses, the stringency is gradually increased to isolate tighter binders and eliminate weaker or nonspecific interactions. This can involve reducing the concentration of the target protein, increasing the number or duration of wash steps to remove weaker binders, or introducing competing molecules to test the specificity of the binders. For instance, in later rounds, a higher concentration of detergent can be used during washing steps to disrupt weaker interactions, or the target concentration may be decreased to favor candidates with higher binding affinities.

Additional strategies to fine-tune the selection pressure include using off-target proteins in negative selection steps to eliminate nonspecific binders or employing different formats of the target protein (e.g., recombinant, native, or mutated forms) to enrich for binders that maintain high specificity and affinity under varying conditions. By carefully modulating these parameters, biopanning can effectively narrow the pool of candidates to identify the most promising binders with the desired characteristics.

4. Optimize Elution Conditions

The efficient elution of bound phages is critical for isolating high-affinity candidates while maintaining their structural integrity and functionality. Gentle elution methods, such as pH changes or competitive binding, are often employed to preserve phage viability and ensure their binding affinity remains intact. For instance, lowering the pH can disrupt the interactions between the phage-displayed peptides and the target, allowing for their release without denaturing the phages. Similarly, competitive binding involves introducing a soluble version of the target or a competing molecule that displaces the bound phages, enabling their elution in a mild and controlled manner.

Another method used for elution is proteolytic cleavage, particularly with enzymes like trypsin. Trypsin selectively cleaves peptide bonds, which can be advantageous when high-affinity binders need to be released from the target. By incorporating a trypsin-cleavable linker sequence between the phage-displayed peptide and the target, trypsin can be applied to cleave the linker, freeing the bound phages. This approach ensures that high-affinity binders, which are often tightly bound to the target and may resist other elution methods, are effectively recovered. Additionally, trypsin-mediated elution is particularly useful in situations where gentle methods fail to release all bound phages, ensuring that even the strongest binders are retrieved for subsequent rounds of selection or analysis.

5. Minimize Non-Specific Binding

Reducing background noise is crucial for identifying and isolating high-quality candidates in any selection process. Non-specific binders, such as those with low affinity or unintended interactions, can overwhelm the output if proper blocking steps or stringent washing conditions are not applied. Negative selection techniques are particularly effective in addressing this issue by actively removing undesirable binders, such as plastic binders or non-specific binders, before moving forward with positive selection.

For example, during a phage display or affinity purification process, non-specific binders may attach to plastic surfaces, such as microtiter plates or tubes, leading to high background noise and false positives. By introducing a negative selection step, such as pre-incubating the target material with plastic surfaces or irrelevant control matrices, these plastic binders can be absorbed and eliminated before actual screening begins. Similarly, washing conditions should be optimized to remove weakly bound or non-specific candidates, ensuring that only high-affinity binders remain.

6. Iterate Thoughtfully

Phage display is an iterative and dynamic process that requires careful evaluation at each stage to optimize results. After every round of selection, it’s crucial to thoroughly analyze the output to determine how well your approach is working and make adjustments for the next iteration. This analysis might involve evaluating the diversity and quality of the selected binders, identifying trends in enrichment, or pinpointing potential issues that need to be addressed.

One of the most effective ways to conduct this analysis is through NGS. Next-generation sequencing provides a powerful tool to closely monitor enrichment patterns across rounds, enabling you to track the evolution of your phage pool at a sequence level. By identifying dominant clones and assessing the progression toward higher-affinity binders, NGS delivers the detailed insights needed to refine your selection strategy and ensure that the final binders meet your performance goals.

Based on the NGS results, you may decide to alter the selection stringency by adjusting factors such as washing conditions or incubation times to encourage the retention of only high-affinity binders. Adjusting target conditions, such as concentration or immobilization methods, can also help improve binder specificity and maximize the selection of desired clones. Additionally, incorporating new negative selection steps can help eliminate non-specific binders or off-target interactions, further enhancing the overall quality of the phage pool.

Conclusion

Optimizing binding affinity in phage display requires a step-by-step approach that blends careful planning and precise execution. By following the outlined steps, researchers can unlock the full potential of phage display. Whether your focus is drug discovery, diagnostics, or basic research, adhering to these best practices will help you engineer high-affinity ligands tailored to your specific goals and applications.

About Us

At Cell Origins, we specialize in conducting high-precision affinity selection processes to streamline your phage display experiments and deliver superior results. Our team of experts is equipped with the knowledge and tools to isolate high-affinity ligands efficiently, saving you time and resources. Additionally, we offer consulting services to help researchers establish robust phage display workflows in their laboratories. Whether you need hands-on guidance or detailed step-by-step protocols, we are committed to empowering your research with tailored support and expert insights.

Continued Reading

Jaroszewicz W, Morcinek-Orłowska J, Pierzynowska K, Gaffke L, Węgrzyn G. Phage display and other peptide display technologies. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2022 Mar 3;46(2):fuab052. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuab052. 

Smith GP. Principles of Affinity Selection. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2024 Jun 3;2024(6):pdb.over107894. doi: 10.1101/pdb.over107894. Erratum in: Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2024 Jul 1;2024(7):pdb.err108575. doi: 10.1101/pdb.err108575. 

Song BPC, Ch'ng ACW, Lim TS. Review of phage display: A jack-of-all-trades and master of most biomolecule display. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024 Jan;256(Pt 2):128455. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128455.