Time-Driven Negotiation Decisions

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

Summary

Time-driven negotiation decisions refer to choices made under the pressure of deadlines or timing strategies, where the urgency or flexibility around time can shape the outcome of a negotiation. This concept highlights how controlling the clock, delaying action, or responding to imposed deadlines can either strengthen your position or lead to costly mistakes.

  • Set your pace: Take control of the timeline early in negotiations to avoid being cornered by last-minute deadlines or rushed decisions.
  • Use time smartly: Consider strategic delays to shift pressure onto the other party, but only when it can improve your terms without harming long-term relationships.
  • Know your limits: Define your walkaway point and backup plans before urgency sets in, so that time pressure doesn’t force you into unwanted concessions.
Summarized by AI based on LinkedIn member posts
  • View profile for Pablo Restrepo

    Helping Individuals, Organizations and Governments in Negotiation | 30 + years of Global Experience | Speaker, Consultant, and Professor | Proud Father | Founder of Negotiation by Design |

    12,499 followers

    Negotiation crises aren’t fate—they’re the cost of unpreparedness.  But if you’re in one, here’s your escape: Years ago, I watched a multimillion-dollar deal go up in flames. A client was negotiating an urgent acquisition. Everything looked solid—until the other side suddenly imposed a “take it or leave it” deadline. The pressure skyrocketed. My client panicked. Within hours, he made a concession that cost his company millions. It didn’t have to happen. The crisis was avoidable. Most negotiation crises don’t come from bad luck. They happen because of four predictable triggers—and if you don’t see them coming, they’ll bury you. What Turns a Negotiation into a Crisis? 1️⃣ Too Little Time  🚨 My client only had 48 hours to decide. That’s not negotiation—that’s a hostage situation.  🚨 Deadlines make people rush into bad deals. 💡 Prevention: Set the pace early.  ↳ If the other side controls the clock, you’re already losing.  💡 Defuse It: Buy time.  ↳ My client should have said: “We need a board review before finalizing.”  ↳ Delays can be strategic. 2️⃣ Too Much at Stake  🚨 He was terrified of losing the deal—so he overpaid.  🚨 Fear leads to desperate decisions. 💡 Prevention: Define your walkaway point in advance.  ↳ Pressure is dangerous when you don’t know your limits.  💡 Defuse It: Shift focus.  ↳ Instead of fixating on the deal, he should have asked, “What happens if we don’t sign?” ↳ Seeing the bigger picture cuts panic. 3️⃣ Too Much Uncertainty  🚨 The seller’s numbers didn’t add up. But my client assumed “it must be fine.”  🚨 Assumptions are silent deal killers. 💡 Prevention: Always verify.  ↳ Demand transparency before committing.  💡 Defuse It: Call out vagueness.  ↳ A simple “Can you clarify this?” could have saved him millions. 4️⃣ Too Few Options  🚨 He felt cornered because he didn’t prepare a backup.  🚨 Weak alternatives force bad choices. 💡 Prevention: Strengthen your BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement).  ↳ If you don’t need their deal, you negotiate from power.  💡 Defuse It: If stuck, expand the playing field.  ↳ My client should have explored deferred payments or performance-based clauses.  ↳ More options = more leverage. The Crisis-Proof Negotiator’s Playbook: ✅ Control the Clock ↳ Never let deadlines dictate your decisions.  ✅ Stay Grounded ↳ Define your non-negotiables before the pressure hits.  ✅ Clarify the Unknowns ↳ Unchecked assumptions lead to expensive mistakes.  ✅ Create Leverage ↳ Your strongest position? The ability to walk away. Final Insight: That client’s crisis cost him millions—but it didn’t have to. Crisis in negotiation isn’t fate. It’s failure to prepare. 💬 What’s the biggest crisis you’ve faced in a negotiation? Drop it in the comments—I’ll share how I’d handle it. 🔁 Think this could save someone from a deal disaster? Hit repost and spread the wisdom. 

  • View profile for Michael Shields

    Vice President of Procurement @ Tropic | Spend Management Enthusiast | Speaker | Advisor | Professor. On a mission to change the perception of Procurement. In tech and beyond.

    20,271 followers

    Truth Number 1: Time kills deals.  Truth Number 2: The party who is least concerned about time often has the most leverage. In a negotiation, time is a massive two-edged swords in a negotiation. Nearly every single in flight deal that I was involved in last week leveraged an EOQ lever. Do I think this is a right and effective play in some cases? Absolutely. Do I think it’s unnecessary and can do more harm than good in other cases? Also absolutely. 2 weeks ago a salesperson (and a friend) called me up. They wanted some advice on a deal they were working on. They explained that they had deployed the EOQ lever and the stakeholder still hadn’t committed and in fact was asking for more. Here’s what I coached him to say: “Hey Bill - Previously I had mentioned that the additional 8% concession was contingent upon a signature by the EOQ. While I think signing by the 31st would certainly be ideal so that we can have the biggest impact for your team in Q2, I also understand that you have a lot going on and I don’t want you to feel rushed. Bottom line, I talked to my leadership and got them to agree to remove the contingency.  We’ll honor the 8% whether you sign this quarter or next. At this point, we feel really good about the proposal on the table. The ROI should be really strong and the SLA reflects that. The team seems really excited. Let me know if there is anything else you need from me.” In this case, Bill responded: “Wow, thanks. I actually think we can get it done but I appreciate the flexibility.” This salesperson texted me last Friday that the deal got signed. I’m genuinely not sure it would have (without additional concessions) if the rep didn’t take away the contingency. Time kills deals. Totally get that. But over-rotating on urgency can in some cases destroy leverage. You intend to put the pressure on the buyer but sometimes we’ll flip it right back on you because it’s so obvious the seller wants the deal by EOQ.  And often times, it can chip away at ACV unnecessarily. Again, each situation is different but it’s a good reminder that there are two sides of the sword. Wield it wisely. (And yes, the name of “Bill” has been changed. Isaiah has convinced me that when changing the name of the prospect, you should always use the name Bill. Not sure why, but I trust his judgment). 

Explore categories