summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/rewrite
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
6 daysFix some comments.Nathan Bossart
Like commit 123661427b, these were discovered while reviewing Aleksander Alekseev's proposed changes to pgindent.
8 daysUse palloc_object() and palloc_array() in backend codeMichael Paquier
The idea is to encourage more the use of these new routines across the tree, as these offer stronger type safety guarantees than palloc(). This batch of changes includes most of the trivial changes suggested by the author for src/backend/. A total of 334 files are updated here. Among these files, 48 of them have their build change slightly; these are caused by line number changes as the new allocation formulas are simpler, shaving around 100 lines of code in total. Similar work has been done in 0c3c5c3b06a3 and 31d3847a37be. Author: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ad0748d4-3080-436e-b0bc-ac8f86a3466a@gmail.com
2025-12-02Remove useless casting to same typePeter Eisentraut
This removes some casts where the input already has the same type as the type specified by the cast. Their presence could cause risks of hiding actual type mismatches in the future or silently discarding qualifiers. It also improves readability. Same kind of idea as 7f798aca1d5 and ef8fe693606. (This does not change all such instances, but only those hand-picked by the author.) Author: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/aSQy2JawavlVlEB0%40ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
2025-11-29Avoid rewriting data-modifying CTEs more than once.Dean Rasheed
Formerly, when updating an auto-updatable view, or a relation with rules, if the original query had any data-modifying CTEs, the rewriter would rewrite those CTEs multiple times as RewriteQuery() recursed into the product queries. In most cases that was harmless, because RewriteQuery() is mostly idempotent. However, if the CTE involved updating an always-generated column, it would trigger an error because any subsequent rewrite would appear to be attempting to assign a non-default value to the always-generated column. This could perhaps be fixed by attempting to make RewriteQuery() fully idempotent, but that looks quite tricky to achieve, and would probably be quite fragile, given that more generated-column-type features might be added in the future. Instead, fix by arranging for RewriteQuery() to rewrite each CTE exactly once (by tracking the number of CTEs already rewritten as it recurses). This has the advantage of being simpler and more efficient, but it does make RewriteQuery() dependent on the order in which rewriteRuleAction() joins the CTE lists from the original query and the rule action, so care must be taken if that is ever changed. Reported-by: Bernice Southey <bernice.southey@gmail.com> Author: Bernice Southey <bernice.southey@gmail.com> Author: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEDh4nyD6MSH9bROhsOsuTqGAv_QceU_GDvN9WcHLtZTCYM1kA@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 14
2025-11-05Fix comments for ChangeVarNodes() and related functionsRichard Guo
The comment for ChangeVarNodes() refers to a parameter named change_RangeTblRef, which does not exist in the code. The comment for ChangeVarNodesExtended() contains an extra space, while the comment for replace_relid_callback() has an awkward line break and a typo. This patch fixes these issues and revises some sentences for smoother wording. Oversights in commits ab42d643c and fc069a3a6. Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs480j16HC1JtjKCgj5WshivT8ZJYkOfTyZAM0POjFomJkg@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 18
2025-09-08Don't generate fake "*TLOCRN*" or "*TROCRN*" aliases, either.Robert Haas
This is just like the previous two commits, except that this fix actually doesn't change any regression test outputs. Author: Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYSYmDA2GvanzPMci084n+mVucv0bJ0HPbs6uhmMN6HMg@mail.gmail.com
2025-08-13Grab the low-hanging fruit from forcing USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL to true.Tom Lane
Remove conditionally-compiled code for the other case. Replace uses of FLOAT8PASSBYVAL with constant "true", mainly because it was quite confusing in cases where the type we were dealing with wasn't float8. I left the associated pg_control and Pg_magic_struct fields in place. Perhaps we should get rid of them, but it would save little, so it doesn't seem worth thinking hard about the compatibility implications. I just labeled them "vestigial" in places where that seemed helpful. Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1749799.1752797397@sss.pgh.pa.us
2025-08-08Remove useless/superfluous Datum conversionsPeter Eisentraut
Remove useless DatumGetFoo() and FooGetDatum() calls. These are places where no conversion from or to Datum was actually happening. We think these extra calls covered here were harmless. Some actual bugs that were discovered during this process have been committed separately (80c758a2e1d, 2242b26ce47). Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/8246d7ff-f4b7-4363-913e-827dadfeb145%40eisentraut.org
2025-07-01Improve code commentPeter Eisentraut
The previous wording was potentially confusing about the impact of the OVERRIDING clause on generated columns. Reword slightly to avoid that. Reported-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CACJufxFMBe0nPXOQZMLTH4Ry5Gyj4m%2B2Z05mRi9KB4hk8rGt9w%40mail.gmail.com
2025-05-30Change internal queryid type from uint64 to int64David Rowley
uint64 was perhaps chosen in cff440d36 as the type was uint32 prior to that widening work. Having this as uint64 doesn't make much sense and just adds the overhead of having to remember that we always output this in its signed form. Let's remove that overhead. The signed form output is seemingly required since we have no way to represent the full range of uint64 in an SQL type. We use BIGINT in places like pg_stat_statements, which maps directly to int64. The release notes "Source Code" section may want to mention this adjustment as some extensions may wish to adjust their code. Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> Reviewed-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/50cb0c8b-994b-48f9-a1c4-13039eb3536b@eisentraut.org
2025-05-07Refactor ChangeVarNodesExtended() using the custom callbackAlexander Korotkov
fc069a3a6319 implemented Self-Join Elimination (SJE) and put related logic to ChangeVarNodes_walker(). This commit provides refactoring to remove the SJE-related logic from ChangeVarNodes_walker() but adds a custom callback to ChangeVarNodesExtended(), which has a chance to process a node before ChangeVarNodes_walker(). Passing this callback to ChangeVarNodesExtended() allows SJE-related node handling to be kept within the analyzejoins.c. Reported-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs49PE3CvnV8vrQ0Dr%3DHqgZZmX0tdNbzVNJxqc8yg-8kDQQ%40mail.gmail.com Author: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> Author: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
2025-05-03Revert "Refactor ChangeVarNodesExtended() using the custom callback"Alexander Korotkov
This reverts commit 250a718aadad68793e82103282247556a46a3cfc. It shouldn't be pushed during the release freeze. Reported-by: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1uBIbY-000owH-0O%40gemulon.postgresql.org
2025-05-03Refactor ChangeVarNodesExtended() using the custom callbackAlexander Korotkov
fc069a3a6319 implemented Self-Join Elimination (SJE) and put related logic to ChangeVarNodes_walker(). This commit provides refactoring to remove the SJE-related logic from ChangeVarNodes_walker() but adds a custom callback to ChangeVarNodesExtended(), which has a chance to process a node before ChangeVarNodes_walker(). Passing this callback to ChangeVarNodesExtended() allows SJE-related node handling to be kept within the analyzejoins.c. Reported-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs49PE3CvnV8vrQ0Dr%3DHqgZZmX0tdNbzVNJxqc8yg-8kDQQ%40mail.gmail.com Author: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> Author: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
2025-04-29Fixes for ChangeVarNodes_walker()Alexander Korotkov
This commit fixes two bug in ChangeVarNodes_walker() function. * When considering RestrictInfo, walk down to its clauses based on the presense of relid to be deleted not just in clause_relids but also in required_relids. * Incrementally adjust num_base_rels based on the change of clause_relids instead of recalculating it using clause_relids, which could contain outer-join relids. Reported-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs49PE3CvnV8vrQ0Dr%3DHqgZZmX0tdNbzVNJxqc8yg-8kDQQ%40mail.gmail.com Author: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
2025-04-28Restore comments in ChangeVarNodesExtended()Alexander Korotkov
This commit restores comments in ChangeVarNodesExtended(), which were accidentally removed by fc069a3a6319. Reported-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs49PE3CvnV8vrQ0Dr%3DHqgZZmX0tdNbzVNJxqc8yg-8kDQQ%40mail.gmail.com
2025-03-13Fix incorrect handling of subquery pullupRichard Guo
When pulling up a subquery, if the subquery's target list items are used in grouping set columns, we need to wrap them in PlaceHolderVars. This ensures that expressions retain their separate identity so that they will match grouping set columns when appropriate. In 90947674f, we decided to wrap subquery outputs that are non-var expressions in PlaceHolderVars. This prevents const-simplification from merging them into the surrounding expressions after subquery pullup, which could otherwise lead to failing to match those subexpressions to grouping set columns, with the effect that they'd not go to null when expected. However, that left some loose ends. If the subquery's target list contains two or more identical Var expressions, we can still fail to match the Var expression to the expected grouping set expression. This is not related to const-simplification, but rather to how we match expressions to lower target items in setrefs.c. For sort/group expressions, we use ressortgroupref matching, which works well. For other expressions, we primarily rely on comparing the expressions to determine if they are the same. Therefore, we need a way to prevent setrefs.c from matching the expression to some other identical ones. To fix, wrap all subquery outputs in PlaceHolderVars if the parent query uses grouping sets, ensuring that they preserve their separate identity throughout the whole planning process. Reported-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4-meSahaanKskpBn0KKxdHAXC1_EJCVWHxEodqirrGJnw@mail.gmail.com
2025-02-25Eliminate code duplication in replace_rte_variables callbacksRichard Guo
The callback functions ReplaceVarsFromTargetList_callback and pullup_replace_vars_callback are both used to replace Vars in an expression tree that reference a particular RTE with items from a targetlist, and they both need to expand whole-tuple references and deal with OLD/NEW RETURNING list Vars. As a result, currently there is significant code duplication between these two functions. This patch introduces a new function, ReplaceVarFromTargetList, to perform the replacement and calls it from both callback functions, thereby eliminating code duplication. Author: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWhr=FM4X5kCPvVs-g2XEk+ceLsNtBK_zZMkqFn9vUjsw@mail.gmail.com
2025-02-25Expand virtual generated columns in the plannerRichard Guo
Commit 83ea6c540 added support for virtual generated columns that are computed on read. All Var nodes in the query that reference virtual generated columns must be replaced with the corresponding generation expressions. Currently, this replacement occurs in the rewriter. However, this approach has several issues. If a Var referencing a virtual generated column has any varnullingrels, those varnullingrels need to be propagated into the generation expression. Failing to do so can lead to "wrong varnullingrels" errors and improper outer-join removal. Additionally, if such a Var comes from the nullable side of an outer join, we may need to wrap the generation expression in a PlaceHolderVar to ensure that it is evaluated at the right place and hence is forced to null when the outer join should do so. In certain cases, such as when the query uses grouping sets, we also need a PlaceHolderVar for anything that is not a simple Var to isolate subexpressions. Failure to do so can result in incorrect results. To fix these issues, this patch expands the virtual generated columns in the planner rather than in the rewriter, and leverages the pullup_replace_vars architecture to avoid code duplication. The generation expressions will be correctly marked with nullingrel bits and wrapped in PlaceHolderVars when needed by the pullup_replace_vars callback function. This requires handling the OLD/NEW RETURNING list Vars in pullup_replace_vars_callback, as it may now deal with Vars referencing the result relation instead of a subquery. The "wrong varnullingrels" error was reported by Alexander Lakhin. The incorrect result issue and the improper outer-join removal issue were reported by Richard Guo. Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> Author: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/75eb1a6f-d59f-42e6-8a78-124ee808cda7@gmail.com
2025-02-17Implement Self-Join EliminationAlexander Korotkov
The Self-Join Elimination (SJE) feature removes an inner join of a plain table to itself in the query tree if it is proven that the join can be replaced with a scan without impacting the query result. Self-join and inner relation get replaced with the outer in query, equivalence classes, and planner info structures. Also, the inner restrictlist moves to the outer one with the removal of duplicated clauses. Thus, this optimization reduces the length of the range table list (this especially makes sense for partitioned relations), reduces the number of restriction clauses and, in turn, selectivity estimations, and potentially improves total planner prediction for the query. This feature is dedicated to avoiding redundancy, which can appear after pull-up transformations or the creation of an EquivalenceClass-derived clause like the below. SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE x IN (SELECT t3.x FROM t1 t3); SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT t3.x FROM t1 t3 WHERE t3.x = t1.x); SELECT * FROM t1,t2, t1 t3 WHERE t1.x = t2.x AND t2.x = t3.x; In the future, we could also reduce redundancy caused by subquery pull-up after unnecessary outer join removal in cases like the one below. SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE x IN (SELECT t3.x FROM t1 t3 LEFT JOIN t2 ON t2.x = t1.x); Also, it can drastically help to join partitioned tables, removing entries even before their expansion. The SJE proof is based on innerrel_is_unique() machinery. We can remove a self-join when for each outer row: 1. At most, one inner row matches the join clause; 2. Each matched inner row must be (physically) the same as the outer one; 3. Inner and outer rows have the same row mark. In this patch, we use the next approach to identify a self-join: 1. Collect all merge-joinable join quals which look like a.x = b.x; 2. Add to the list above the baseretrictinfo of the inner table; 3. Check innerrel_is_unique() for the qual list. If it returns false, skip this pair of joining tables; 4. Check uniqueness, proved by the baserestrictinfo clauses. To prove the possibility of self-join elimination, the inner and outer clauses must match exactly. The relation replacement procedure is not trivial and is partly combined with the one used to remove useless left joins. Tests covering this feature were added to join.sql. Some of the existing regression tests changed due to self-join removal logic. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/64486b0b-0404-e39e-322d-0801154901f3%40postgrespro.ru Author: Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> Author: Alexander Kuzmenkov <a.kuzmenkov@postgrespro.ru> Co-authored-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Reviewed-by: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> Reviewed-by: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> Reviewed-by: Hywel Carver <hywel@skillerwhale.com> Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> Reviewed-by: Ronan Dunklau <ronan.dunklau@aiven.io> Reviewed-by: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> Reviewed-by: Michał Kłeczek <michal@kleczek.org> Reviewed-by: Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru> Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
2025-02-07Virtual generated columnsPeter Eisentraut
This adds a new variant of generated columns that are computed on read (like a view, unlike the existing stored generated columns, which are computed on write, like a materialized view). The syntax for the column definition is ... GENERATED ALWAYS AS (...) VIRTUAL and VIRTUAL is also optional. VIRTUAL is the default rather than STORED to match various other SQL products. (The SQL standard makes no specification about this, but it also doesn't know about VIRTUAL or STORED.) (Also, virtual views are the default, rather than materialized views.) Virtual generated columns are stored in tuples as null values. (A very early version of this patch had the ambition to not store them at all. But so much stuff breaks or gets confused if you have tuples where a column in the middle is completely missing. This is a compromise, and it still saves space over being forced to use stored generated columns. If we ever find a way to improve this, a bit of pg_upgrade cleverness could allow for upgrades to a newer scheme.) The capabilities and restrictions of virtual generated columns are mostly the same as for stored generated columns. In some cases, this patch keeps virtual generated columns more restricted than they might technically need to be, to keep the two kinds consistent. Some of that could maybe be relaxed later after separate careful considerations. Some functionality that is currently not supported, but could possibly be added as incremental features, some easier than others: - index on or using a virtual column - hence also no unique constraints on virtual columns - extended statistics on virtual columns - foreign-key constraints on virtual columns - not-null constraints on virtual columns (check constraints are supported) - ALTER TABLE / DROP EXPRESSION - virtual column cannot have domain type - virtual columns are not supported in logical replication The tests in generated_virtual.sql have been copied over from generated_stored.sql with the keyword replaced. This way we can make sure the behavior is mostly aligned, and the differences can be visible. Some tests for currently not supported features are currently commented out. Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> Tested-by: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/a368248e-69e4-40be-9c07-6c3b5880b0a6@eisentraut.org
2025-01-29Handle default NULL insertion a little better.Tom Lane
If a column is omitted in an INSERT, and there's no column default, the code in preptlist.c generates a NULL Const to be inserted. Furthermore, if the column is of a domain type, we wrap the Const in CoerceToDomain, so as to throw a run-time error if the domain has a NOT NULL constraint. That's fine as far as it goes, but there are two problems: 1. We're being sloppy about the type/typmod that the Const is labeled with. It really should have the domain's base type/typmod, since it's the input to CoerceToDomain not the output. This can result in coerce_to_domain inserting a useless length-coercion function (useless because it's being applied to a null). The coercion would typically get const-folded away later, but it'd be better not to create it in the first place. 2. We're not applying expression preprocessing (specifically, eval_const_expressions) to the resulting expression tree. The planner's primary expression-preprocessing pass already happened, so that means the length coercion step and CoerceToDomain node miss preprocessing altogether. This is at the least inefficient, since it means the length coercion and CoerceToDomain will actually be executed for each inserted row, though they could be const-folded away in most cases. Worse, it seems possible that missing preprocessing for the length coercion could result in an invalid plan (for example, due to failing to perform default-function-argument insertion). I'm not aware of any live bug of that sort with core datatypes, and it might be unreachable for extension types as well because of restrictions of CREATE CAST, but I'm not entirely convinced that it's unreachable. Hence, it seems worth back-patching the fix (although I only went back to v14, as the patch doesn't apply cleanly at all in v13). There are several places in the rewriter that are building null domain constants the same way as preptlist.c. While those are before the planner and hence don't have any reachable bug, they're still applying a length coercion that will be const-folded away later, uselessly wasting cycles. Hence, make a utility routine that all of these places can call to do it right. Making this code more careful about the typmod assigned to the generated NULL constant has visible but cosmetic effects on some of the plans shown in contrib/postgres_fdw's regression tests. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1865579.1738113656@sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch-through: 14
2025-01-16Add OLD/NEW support to RETURNING in DML queries.Dean Rasheed
This allows the RETURNING list of INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE/MERGE queries to explicitly return old and new values by using the special aliases "old" and "new", which are automatically added to the query (if not already defined) while parsing its RETURNING list, allowing things like: RETURNING old.colname, new.colname, ... RETURNING old.*, new.* Additionally, a new syntax is supported, allowing the names "old" and "new" to be changed to user-supplied alias names, e.g.: RETURNING WITH (OLD AS o, NEW AS n) o.colname, n.colname, ... This is useful when the names "old" and "new" are already defined, such as inside trigger functions, allowing backwards compatibility to be maintained -- the interpretation of any existing queries that happen to already refer to relations called "old" or "new", or use those as aliases for other relations, is not changed. For an INSERT, old values will generally be NULL, and for a DELETE, new values will generally be NULL, but that may change for an INSERT with an ON CONFLICT ... DO UPDATE clause, or if a query rewrite rule changes the command type. Therefore, we put no restrictions on the use of old and new in any DML queries. Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Jian He and Jeff Davis. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWx0J0-v=Qjc6gXzR=KtsdvAE7Ow=D=mu50AgOe+pvisQ@mail.gmail.com
2025-01-01Update copyright for 2025Bruce Momjian
Backpatch-through: 13
2024-11-28Remove useless casts to (void *)Peter Eisentraut
Many of them just seem to have been copied around for no real reason. Their presence causes (small) risks of hiding actual type mismatches or silently discarding qualifiers Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/461ea37c-8b58-43b4-9736-52884e862820@eisentraut.org
2024-11-11Ensure cached plans are correctly marked as dependent on role.Nathan Bossart
If a CTE, subquery, sublink, security invoker view, or coercion projection references a table with row-level security policies, we neglected to mark the plan as potentially dependent on which role is executing it. This could lead to later executions in the same session returning or hiding rows that should have been hidden or returned instead. Reported-by: Wolfgang Walther Reviewed-by: Noah Misch Security: CVE-2024-10976 Backpatch-through: 12
2024-10-17Fix unnecessary casts of copyObject() resultPeter Eisentraut
The result is already of the correct type, so these casts don't do anything. Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/637eeea8-5663-460b-a114-39572c0f6c6e%40eisentraut.org
2024-08-30Avoid inserting PlaceHolderVars in cases where pre-v16 PG did not.Tom Lane
Commit 2489d76c4 removed some logic from pullup_replace_vars() that avoided wrapping a PlaceHolderVar around a pulled-up subquery output expression if the expression could be proven to go to NULL anyway (because it contained Vars or PHVs of the pulled-up relation and did not contain non-strict constructs). But removing that logic turns out to cause performance regressions in some cases, because the extra PHV blocks subexpression folding, and will do so even if outer-join reduction later turns it into a no-op with no phnullingrels bits. This can for example prevent an expression from being matched to an index. The reason for always adding a PHV was to ensure we had someplace to put the varnullingrels marker bits of the Var being replaced. However, it turns out we can optimize in exactly the same cases that the previous code did, because we can instead attach the needed varnullingrels bits to the contained Var(s)/PHV(s). This is not a complete solution --- it would be even better if we could remove PHVs after reducing them to no-ops. It doesn't look practical to back-patch such an improvement, but this change seems safe and at least gets rid of the performance-regression cases. Per complaint from Nikhil Raj. Back-patch to v16 where the problem appeared. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAG1ps1xvnTZceKK24OUfMKLPvDP2vjT-d+F2AOCWbw_v3KeEgg@mail.gmail.com
2024-08-29Message style improvementsPeter Eisentraut
2024-08-05Restrict accesses to non-system views and foreign tables during pg_dump.Masahiko Sawada
When pg_dump retrieves the list of database objects and performs the data dump, there was possibility that objects are replaced with others of the same name, such as views, and access them. This vulnerability could result in code execution with superuser privileges during the pg_dump process. This issue can arise when dumping data of sequences, foreign tables (only 13 or later), or tables registered with a WHERE clause in the extension configuration table. To address this, pg_dump now utilizes the newly introduced restrict_nonsystem_relation_kind GUC parameter to restrict the accesses to non-system views and foreign tables during the dump process. This new GUC parameter is added to back branches too, but these changes do not require cluster recreation. Back-patch to all supported branches. Reviewed-by: Noah Misch Security: CVE-2024-7348 Backpatch-through: 12
2024-07-20Correctly check updatability of columns targeted by INSERT...DEFAULT.Tom Lane
If a view has some updatable and some non-updatable columns, we failed to verify updatability of any columns for which an INSERT or UPDATE on the view explicitly specifies a DEFAULT item (unless the view has a declared default for that column, which is rare anyway, and one would almost certainly not write one for a non-updatable column). This would lead to an unexpected "attribute number N not found in view targetlist" error rather than the intended error. Per bug #18546 from Alexander Lakhin. This bug is old, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18546-84a292e759a9361d@postgresql.org
2024-05-07Fix assorted bugs related to identity column in partitioned tablesPeter Eisentraut
When changing the data type of a column of a partitioned table, craft the ALTER SEQUENCE command only once. Partitions do not have identity sequences of their own and thus do not need a ALTER SEQUENCE command for each partition. Fix getIdentitySequence() to fetch the identity sequence associated with the top-level partitioned table when a Relation of a partition is passed to it. While doing so, translate the attribute number of the partition into the attribute number of the partitioned table. Author: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3b8a9dc1-bbc7-0ef5-6863-c432afac7d59@gmail.com
2024-03-17Add RETURNING support to MERGE.Dean Rasheed
This allows a RETURNING clause to be appended to a MERGE query, to return values based on each row inserted, updated, or deleted. As with plain INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE commands, the returned values are based on the new contents of the target table for INSERT and UPDATE actions, and on its old contents for DELETE actions. Values from the source relation may also be returned. As with INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE, the output of MERGE ... RETURNING may be used as the source relation for other operations such as WITH queries and COPY commands. Additionally, a special function merge_action() is provided, which returns 'INSERT', 'UPDATE', or 'DELETE', depending on the action executed for each row. The merge_action() function can be used anywhere in the RETURNING list, including in arbitrary expressions and subqueries, but it is an error to use it anywhere outside of a MERGE query's RETURNING list. Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Isaac Morland, Vik Fearing, Alvaro Herrera, Gurjeet Singh, Jian He, Jeff Davis, Merlin Moncure, Peter Eisentraut, and Wolfgang Walther. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWePEGQR5LBn-vD6SfeLZafzEm2Qy_L_Oky2=qw2w3Pzg@mail.gmail.com
2024-03-14Make INSERT-from-multiple-VALUES-rows handle domain target columns.Tom Lane
Commit a3c7a993d fixed some cases involving target columns that are arrays or composites by applying transformAssignedExpr to the VALUES entries, and then stripping off any assignment ArrayRefs or FieldStores that the transformation added. But I forgot about domains over arrays or composites :-(. Such cases would either fail with surprising complaints about mismatched datatypes, or insert unexpected coercions that could lead to odd results. To fix, extend the stripping logic to get rid of CoerceToDomain if it's atop an ArrayRef or FieldStore. While poking at this, I realized that there's a poorly documented and not-at-all-tested behavior nearby: we coerce each VALUES column to the domain type separately, and rely on the rewriter to merge those operations so that the domain constraints are checked only once. If that merging did not happen, it's entirely possible that we'd get unexpected domain constraint failures due to checking a partially-updated container value. There's no bug there, but while we're here let's improve the commentary about it and add some test cases that explicitly exercise that behavior. Per bug #18393 from Pablo Kharo. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18393-65fedb1a0de9260d@postgresql.org
2024-03-13Make the order of the header file includes consistentPeter Eisentraut
Similar to commit 7e735035f20. Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMbWs4-WhpCFMbXCjtJ%2BFzmjfPrp7Hw1pk4p%2BZpU95Kh3ofZ1A%40mail.gmail.com
2024-03-04Remove unused #include's from backend .c filesPeter Eisentraut
as determined by include-what-you-use (IWYU) While IWYU also suggests to *add* a bunch of #include's (which is its main purpose), this patch does not do that. In some cases, a more specific #include replaces another less specific one. Some manual adjustments of the automatic result: - IWYU currently doesn't know about includes that provide global variable declarations (like -Wmissing-variable-declarations), so those includes are being kept manually. - All includes for port(ability) headers are being kept for now, to play it safe. - No changes of catalog/pg_foo.h to catalog/pg_foo_d.h, to keep the patch from exploding in size. Note that this patch touches just *.c files, so nothing declared in header files changes in hidden ways. As a small example, in src/backend/access/transam/rmgr.c, some IWYU pragma annotations are added to handle a special case there. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/af837490-6b2f-46df-ba05-37ea6a6653fc%40eisentraut.org
2024-02-29Support MERGE into updatable views.Dean Rasheed
This allows the target relation of MERGE to be an auto-updatable or trigger-updatable view, and includes support for WITH CHECK OPTION, security barrier views, and security invoker views. A trigger-updatable view must have INSTEAD OF triggers for every type of action (INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE) mentioned in the MERGE command. An auto-updatable view must not have any INSTEAD OF triggers. Mixing auto-update and trigger-update actions (i.e., having a partial set of INSTEAD OF triggers) is not supported. Rule-updatable views are also not supported, since there is no rewriter support for non-SELECT rules with MERGE operations. Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Jian He and Alvaro Herrera. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCVcB1g0nmxuEc-A+gGB0HnfcGQNGYH7gS=7rq0u0zOBXA@mail.gmail.com
2024-01-16Support identity columns in partitioned tablesPeter Eisentraut
Previously, identity columns were disallowed on partitioned tables. (The reason was mainly that no one had gotten around to working through all the details to make it work.) This makes it work now. Some details on the behavior: * A newly created partition inherits identity property The partitions of a partitioned table are integral part of the partitioned table. A partition inherits identity columns from the partitioned table. An identity column of a partition shares the identity space with the corresponding column of the partitioned table. In other words, the same identity column across all partitions of a partitioned table share the same identity space. This is effected by sharing the same underlying sequence. When INSERTing directly into a partition, the sequence associated with the topmost partitioned table is used to calculate the value of the corresponding identity column. In regular inheritance, identity columns and their properties in a child table are independent of those in its parent tables. A child table does not inherit identity columns or their properties automatically from the parent. (This is unchanged.) * Attached partition inherits identity column A table being attached as a partition inherits the identity property from the partitioned table. This should be fine since we expect that the partition table's column has the same type as the partitioned table's corresponding column. If the table being attached is a partitioned table, the identity properties are propagated down its partition hierarchy. An identity column in the partitioned table is also marked as NOT NULL. The corresponding column in the partition needs to be marked as NOT NULL for the attach to succeed. * Drop identity property when detaching partition A partition's identity column shares the identity space (i.e. underlying sequence) as the corresponding column of the partitioned table. If a partition is detached it can longer share the identity space as before. Hence the identity columns of the partition being detached loose their identity property. When identity of a column of a regular table is dropped it retains the NOT NULL constraint that came with the identity property. Similarly the columns of the partition being detached retain the NOT NULL constraints that came with identity property, even though the identity property itself is lost. The sequence associated with the identity property is linked to the partitioned table (and not the partition being detached). That sequence is not dropped as part of detach operation. * Partitions with their own identity columns are not allowed. * The usual ALTER operations (add identity column, add identity property to existing column, alter properties of an indentity column, drop identity property) are supported for partitioned tables. Changing a column only in a partitioned table or a partition is not allowed; the change needs to be applied to the whole partition hierarchy. Author: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAExHW5uOykuTC+C6R1yDSp=o8Q83jr8xJdZxgPkxfZ1Ue5RRGg@mail.gmail.com
2024-01-04Update copyright for 2024Bruce Momjian
Reported-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZZKTDPxBBMt3C0J9@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 12
2023-09-27Add TupleDescGetDefault()Peter Eisentraut
This unifies some repetitive code. Note: I didn't push the "not found" error message into the new function, even though all existing callers would be able to make use of it. Using the existing error handling as-is would probably require exposing the Relation type via tupdesc.h, which doesn't seem desirable. (Or even if we changed it to just report the OID, it would inject the concept of a relation containing the tuple descriptor into tupdesc.h, which might be a layering violation. Perhaps some further improvements could be considered here separately.) Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/52a125e4-ff9a-95f5-9f61-b87cf447e4da%40eisentraut.org
2023-08-07Fix RLS policy usage in MERGE.Dean Rasheed
If MERGE executes an UPDATE action on a table with row-level security, the code incorrectly applied the WITH CHECK clauses from the target table's INSERT policies to new rows, instead of the clauses from the table's UPDATE policies. In addition, it failed to check new rows against the target table's SELECT policies, if SELECT permissions were required (likely to always be the case). In addition, if MERGE executes a DO NOTHING action for matched rows, the code incorrectly applied the USING clauses from the target table's DELETE policies to existing target tuples. These policies were applied as checks that would throw an error, if they did not pass. Fix this, so that a MERGE UPDATE action applies the same RLS policies as a plain UPDATE query with a WHERE clause, and a DO NOTHING action does not apply any RLS checks (other than adding clauses from SELECT policies to the join). Back-patch to v15, where MERGE was introduced. Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Stephen Frost. Security: CVE-2023-39418
2023-07-03A minor simplification for List manipulationPeter Eisentraut
Fix one place that was using lfirst(list_head(list)) by using linitial(list) instead. They are equivalent but the latter is simpler. We did the same in 9d299a49. Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMbWs49dJnpezDQDDxCPKq7+=_3NyqLqGqnhqCjd+dYe4MS15w@mail.gmail.com
2023-06-16Fix typo in comment.Amit Langote
Back-patch down to 11. Author: Sho Kato (<kato-sho@fujitsu.com>) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYCPR01MB68499042A33BC32241193AAF9F5BA%40TYCPR01MB6849.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
2023-06-14Retain relkind too in RTE_SUBQUERY entries for views.Amit Langote
47bb9db75 modified the ApplyRetrieveRule()'s conversion of a view's original RTE_RELATION entry into an RTE_SUBQUERY one to retain relid, rellockmode, and perminfoindex so that the executor can lock the view and check its permissions. It seems better to also retain relkind for cross-checking that the exception of an RTE_SUBQUERY entry being allowed to carry relation details only applies to views, so do so. Bump catversion because this changes the output format of RTE_SUBQUERY RTEs. Suggested-by: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> Reviewed-by: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3953179e-9540-e5d1-a743-4bef368785b0%40pgmasters.net
2023-06-13Correctly update hasSubLinks while mutating a rule action.Tom Lane
rewriteRuleAction neglected to check for SubLink nodes in the securityQuals of range table entries. This could lead to failing to convert such a SubLink to a SubPlan, resulting in assertion crashes or weird errors later in planning. In passing, fix some poor coding in rewriteTargetView: we should not pass the source parsetree's hasSubLinks field to ReplaceVarsFromTargetList's outer_hasSubLinks. ReplaceVarsFromTargetList knows enough to ignore that when a Query node is passed, but it's still confusing and bad precedent: if we did try to update that flag we'd be updating a stale copy of the parsetree. Per bug #17972 from Alexander Lakhin. This has been broken since we added RangeTblEntry.securityQuals (although the presented test case only fails back to 215b43cdc), so back-patch all the way. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17972-f422c094237847d0@postgresql.org
2023-06-08Re-allow INDEX_VAR as rt_index in ChangeVarNodes().Tom Lane
Apparently some extensions are in the habit of calling ChangeVarNodes() with INDEX_VAR as the rt_index to replace. That worked before 2489d76c4, at least as long as there were not PlaceHolderVars in the expression; but now it fails because bms_is_member spits up. Add a test to avoid that. Per report from Anton Melnikov, though this is not his proposed patch. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5b370a46-f6d2-373d-9dbc-0d55250e82c1@inbox.ru
2023-05-19Pre-beta mechanical code beautification.Tom Lane
Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files. This set of diffs is a bit larger than typical. We've updated to pg_bsd_indent 2.1.2, which properly indents variable declarations that have multi-line initialization expressions (the continuation lines are now indented one tab stop). We've also updated to perltidy version 20230309 and changed some of its settings, which reduces its desire to add whitespace to lines to make assignments etc. line up. Going forward, that should make for fewer random-seeming changes to existing code. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230428092545.qfb3y5wcu4cm75ur@alvherre.pgsql
2023-04-18Fix various typosDavid Rowley
This fixes many spelling mistakes in comments, but a few references to invalid parameter names, function names and option names too in comments and also some in string constants Also, fix an #undef that was undefining the incorrect definition Author: Alexander Lakhin Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d5f68d19-c0fc-91a9-118d-7c6a5a3f5fad@gmail.com
2023-03-07Fix more bugs caused by adding columns to the end of a view.Tom Lane
If a view is defined atop another view, and then CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW is used to add columns to the lower view, then when the upper view's referencing RTE is expanded by ApplyRetrieveRule we will have a subquery RTE with fewer eref->colnames than output columns. This confuses various code that assumes those lists are always in sync, as they are in plain parser output. We have seen such problems before (cf commit d5b760ecb), and now I think the time has come to do what was speculated about in that commit: let's make ApplyRetrieveRule synthesize some column names to preserve the invariant that holds in parser output. Otherwise we'll be chasing this class of bugs indefinitely. Moreover, it appears from testing that this actually gives us better results in the test case d5b760ecb added, and likely in other corner cases that we lack coverage for. In HEAD, I replaced d5b760ecb's hack to make expandRTE exit early with an elog(ERROR) call, since the case is now presumably unreachable. But it seems like changing that in back branches would bring more risk than benefit, so there I just updated the comment. Per bug #17811 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17811-d31686b78f0dffc9@postgresql.org
2023-03-02Remove local optimizations of empty Bitmapsets into null pointers.Tom Lane
These are all dead code now that it's done centrally. Patch by me; thanks to Nathan Bossart and Richard Guo for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1159933.1677621588@sss.pgh.pa.us
2023-02-25Fix mishandling of OLD/NEW references in subqueries in rule actions.Dean Rasheed
If a rule action contains a subquery that refers to columns from OLD or NEW, then those are really lateral references, and the planner will complain if it sees such things in a subquery that isn't marked as lateral. However, at rule-definition time, the user isn't required to mark the subquery with LATERAL, and so it can fail when the rule is used. Fix this by marking such subqueries as lateral in the rewriter, at the point where they're used. Dean Rasheed and Tom Lane, per report from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5e09da43-aaba-7ea7-0a51-a2eb981b058b%40gmail.com