Skip to content

Conversation

@JunliXiao
Copy link

Issue #1168

Done

這部分大概有兩個問題:

  1. 例如 introduction 1.2 這部分,跟之後章節偶爾出現的文法定義區塊,其實這些區塊裡很多字是可以翻,也出現在翻譯內文,像是 name、letter、digit 等,但因為那些區塊內容沒有在 po 檔內改不到,所以目前統一沒翻這些
  2. "token" 的翻譯問題,我有看到最後一章完整文法裡有出現「語彙符號」這個翻法,這個也許可以另外開個討論。目前簡介這章裡我是都保留為 “token"

@mattwang44 mattwang44 requested a review from rockleona November 23, 2025 14:46
Copy link
Collaborator

@rockleona rockleona left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review 1st round:

感謝你的貢獻!回覆你的問題

  1. 我們只專注在 po 檔案中的翻譯內容,如果沒出現的話就可以忽略了🤣
  2. 這部分沒問題,個人認為 token 這個詞的翻譯太仰賴前後文,但還是麻煩你有空去 Discussion 開一個討論吧!

Comment on lines 64 to 67
"在一份語言的參考文件中加入太多實作細節,是很危險的——這些細節將來可能變化,同"
"一個語言的其他實作也可能有不一樣的運作方式。然而,CPython 是一個廣泛使用的 "
"Python 實作,而有時候它的一些特別古怪之處確實值得提及,尤其當那樣的實作作法帶"
"來了額外限制。基於這個原因,手冊內你會發現簡短的實作細節說明散落在各處。"
Copy link
Collaborator

@rockleona rockleona Nov 24, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

這句好像沒有翻譯到?

(although alternate implementations continue to gain support)

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK 對,我再補上

Copy link
Collaborator

@rockleona rockleona left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review 2nd round,再麻煩修正,感謝!

Comment on lines +220 to +221
"每一條規則的開頭即規則名稱,接著一個分號 ``:``。分號右側是由下列語法元素所構"
"成的規則定義 :"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(which identifies the rule that's being defined) 這句話好像沒翻譯到

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

括號這句我有點不解,好像是不必要的、很抽象的說明?
我是覺得略過這句也無礙對這段的理解

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants