4

Extending on from this question, I'm trying to pass a complex object containing a collection of complex objects to an ASP.NET Web API controller action method, but I'm having trouble finding the correct format to use for my input object in the request. Continuing the example from Christopher Johnson's question (and removing some fields for simplicty), if I change his PhoneRequest object to contain a collection of phone numbers...

public class PhoneRequest
{
    public string[] PhoneNumbers { get; set; }
    public string State { get; set; }
}

...and I either pass the parameter as a URL encoded query string:

/api/phonenumber?id[0][State]=UT&id[0][PhoneNumbers][0]=555-1234567

...or POST it as a html form encoded (Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded) request body:

[0][State]=UT&[0][PhoneNumbers][0]=555-1234567

...then everything works great. But If I change PhoneNumbers from a collection of strings to a collection of a new PhoneNumber type...

public class PhoneRequest
{
    public PhoneNumber[] PhoneNumbers { get; set; }
    public string State { get; set; }
}
public class PhoneNumber
{
    string AreaCode { get; set; }
    string Number { get; set; }
}

...and I pass the object in what appears to me to be the logical way, given the previous result...

id[0][State]=UT&id[0][PhoneNumbers][0][AreaCode]=555&id[0][PhoneNumbers][0][Number]=1234567

...or again as a html form post body...

[0][State]=UT&[0][PhoneNumbers][0][AreaCode]=555&[0][PhoneNumbers][0][Number]=1234567

...then it still makes an attempt to bind it, and gets into my action method, but the model only contains State, and the phone number is this weird ComplexUriAndFormObject thing. Here's a copy-paste from my debugger Watch:

phoneRequest    {ComplexUriAndFormObject.Models.PhoneRequest[1]}
    [0] {ComplexUriAndFormObject.Models.PhoneRequest}
        PhoneNumbers    {ComplexUriAndFormObject.Models.PhoneNumber[1]}
        [0] {ComplexUriAndFormObject.Models.PhoneNumber}
            AreaCode    null
            Number  null
        State   "UT"

Is there some way to specify this object correctly using this format? Or have I exceeded the limit of what ASP.NET Web API's built in model binders are able to do?

Note: Please don't say "just use POST" or "just use JSON/XML/Whatever as your Content-Type"... If I was able to do that, I would.

1 Answer 1

8

Until now, no built-in Web API model binders including derived FromUri and FromBody attributes support passing a complex object that contains any property of non-primitive class types (excluding the System.String) with query strings. I had the similar issues and have created a unique and advanced custom model binder, the FieldValueModelBinder class, to work on a target object hierarchy having generic list or array collections. I can use the pure query string type of source data without imbedding any JSON or XML structure into it. The model binder can be used as easy as the FromUri and FromBody attributes. It also works effectively for transferring query string data in both URI and request body.

Please read my article and download source code I have just posted using this link. You can also run the test app from the download source for your input string, model, and results. I hope that this is the right solution you need.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

1 Comment

This exactly addresses my problem! Thanks, and welcome to SO :)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.