I have a form label containing an input:
<label data-live-email-check="http://www.example-service-uri.com/">
<span class="embedded-label">Email</span>
<input ng-model="formData.email"
type="email"
name="email"
placeholder="Email"
required/>
<span class="message" ng-show="emailValidationMessage">{{emailValidationMessage}}</span>
</label>
I want to create a directive that takes the URL provided by the data-live-email-check attribute and sends the email to that URL, validating whether or not it already exists.
angular.module("App").directive("liveEmailCheck", [function () {
return {
restrict: "A",
scope: {
ngModel: "="
},
link: function (scope, element, attrs) {
scope.$watch(
function(){
return scope.ngModel
},
function(newVal){
console.log(newVal);
}
);
}
}
}]);
I just want to watch the model on the input, and fire a request when it updates. Since the directive is defined on the label element ngModel is not properly bound. What am I doing wrong? My watch expression is not logging anything because it never fires.
I know I could manually grab the input, but that just seems like I'd be breaking the "angular pattern" that I feel so "bound" by. The frustrating thing is that there seems to be so many ways to do everything in Angular that I can never tell if I'm approaching a problem correctly or not.
--Edit--
To provide the solution that I personally would take (out of ignorance of a "better" way), would be the following:
angular.module("App").directive("liveEmailCheck", [function () {
return {
restrict: "A",
require: ["^form"],
link: function (scope, element, attrs, ctrl) {
var formCtrl = ctrl[0];
scope.formEl = formCtrl[element.find("input").attr("name")];
scope.$watch(function(){return scope.formEl.$valid},
function(newVal){
console.log(newVal);
});
}
}
}]);
This WORKS, but I feel like it "breaks the angular rules".