32

When I use pandas to read a MySQL table, some columns (see 'to_nlc' in the image below) that used to have an integer type became a floating-point number (automatically append .0).

Can anyone figure out why this happens? Or at least have a guess?

enter image description here enter image description hereenter image description here

5 Answers 5

23

Problem is your data contains NaN values, so int is automatically cast to float.

I think you can check NA type promotions:

When introducing NAs into an existing Series or DataFrame via reindex or some other means, boolean and integer types will be promoted to a different dtype in order to store the NAs. These are summarized by this table:

Typeclass   Promotion dtype for storing NAs
floating    no change
object      no change
integer     cast to float64
boolean     cast to object

While this may seem like a heavy trade-off, in practice I have found very few cases where this is an issue in practice. Some explanation for the motivation here in the next section.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

5 Comments

how can this be avoided? The integer are used as identifiers so that casting to float causes precision errors
@HananShteingart - is possible replace NaN to 0 ? like df['colname'] = df['colname'].fillna().astype(int) or df = df.fillna(0).astype(int) ?
I already get it as float from the SQL. What I did is to cast the column to a string in the sql query: e.g. CAST(bigint_column AS VARCHAR) so I get it as a string in the dataframe. I didn't mind that it's not numeric anymore because the column represents an ID anyway.
Is there an update for this answer? I've seen pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/integer_na.html
@MartinThoma - Honestly no idea, if use integer na and raise error then not.
3

As another answer states:

The problem is that your data contains NaN values, so int is automatically cast to float.

The solution, in my case, was to use the pd.read_sql option dtype_backend='numpy_nullable'. This option was new in version 2.0, and the value that worked for me, 'numpy_nullable' became the default in pandas 2.1.0. I'm on pandas 2.0.3, and had to use this option.

With this option, my ints remained ints despite nulls in some of the columns.

Comments

1

As already said the problem is that pandas' integer can not handle NULL/NA value.

You can replace read_sql_table with read_sql and convert NULL to some integer value (for example 0 or -1, something which has NULL sense in your setting):

df = pandas.read_sql("SELECT col1, col2, IFNULL(col3, 0) FROM table", engine)

Here col3 can be NULL in mysql, ifnull will return 0 if it is NULL or col3 value otherwise.

Or same thing with little function helper:

def read_sql_table_with_nullcast(table_name, engine, null_cast={}):
    """
    table_name - table name
    engine - sql engine
    null_cast - dictionary of columns to replace NULL:
           column name as key value to replace with as value.
           for example {'col3':0} will set all NULL in col3 to 0
    """
    import pandas
    cols = pandas.read_sql("SHOW COLUMNS FROM " + table_name, engine)
    cols_call = [c if c not in null_cast else "ifnull(%s,%d) as %s"%(c,null_cast[c],c) for c in cols['Field']]
    sel = ",".join(cols_call)
    return pandas.read_sql("SELECT " + sel + " FROM " + table_name, engine)

read_sql_table_with_nullcast("table", engine, {'col3':0})

Comments

1

You can use parameters: coerce_float=False

df = pd.read_sql(sql, con=conn, coerce_float=False)

coerce_floatbool, default True Attempts to convert values of non-string, non-numeric objects (like decimal.Decimal) to floating point, useful for SQL result sets.

https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/reference/api/pandas.read_sql.html

1 Comment

This did NOT fix it in my case. I'm not sure NA values are what they are thinking of when the docs speak of "non-string, non-numeric objects"
0

Another possibility is to exclude NULL values in the WHERE clause of your SQL query, if you're not expecting them and they correspond to unusable rows.

So it won't be suitable in all circumstances, but is a clean and simple option when it does apply.

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.