I've been using numpy for several years, and I've never seen such a function.
Here's one way you could do it (not necessarily the most efficient):
In [47]: a
Out[47]:
array([[ 0, 1, 2, 3],
[ 4, 5, 6, 7],
[ 8, 9, 10, 11],
[12, 13, 14, 15]])
In [48]: np.concatenate([np.diagonal(a[::-1,:], k)[::(2*(k % 2)-1)] for k in range(1-a.shape[0], a.shape[0])])
Out[48]: array([ 0, 1, 4, 8, 5, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 10, 7, 11, 14, 15])
Breaking down the one-liner into separate steps:
a[::-1, :] reverses the rows:
In [59]: a[::-1, :]
Out[59]:
array([[12, 13, 14, 15],
[ 8, 9, 10, 11],
[ 4, 5, 6, 7],
[ 0, 1, 2, 3]])
(This could also be written a[::-1] or np.flipud(a).)
np.diagonal(a, k) extracts the kth diagonal, where k=0 is the main diagonal. So, for example,
In [65]: np.diagonal(a[::-1, :], -3)
Out[65]: array([0])
In [66]: np.diagonal(a[::-1, :], -2)
Out[66]: array([4, 1])
In [67]: np.diagonal(a[::-1, :], 0)
Out[67]: array([12, 9, 6, 3])
In [68]: np.diagonal(a[::-1, :], 2)
Out[68]: array([14, 11])
In the list comprehension, k gives the diagonal to be extracted. We want to reverse the elements in every other diagonal. The expression 2*(k % 2) - 1 gives the values 1, -1, 1, ... as k varies from -3 to 3. Indexing with [::1] leaves the order of the array being indexed unchanged, and indexing with [::-1] reverses the order of the array. So np.diagonal(a[::-1, :], k)[::(2*(k % 2)-1)] gives the kth diagonal, but with every other diagonal reversed:
In [71]: [np.diagonal(a[::-1,:], k)[::(2*(k % 2)-1)] for k in range(1-a.shape[0], a.shape[0])]
Out[71]:
[array([0]),
array([1, 4]),
array([8, 5, 2]),
array([ 3, 6, 9, 12]),
array([13, 10, 7]),
array([11, 14]),
array([15])]
np.concatenate() puts them all into a single array:
In [72]: np.concatenate([np.diagonal(a[::-1,:], k)[::(2*(k % 2)-1)] for k in range(1-a.shape[0], a.shape[0])])
Out[72]: array([ 0, 1, 4, 8, 5, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 10, 7, 11, 14, 15])